Equine Vision Research to Influence Jump Racing Obstacle Design
By Mark Andrews
The colours deployed on hurdles and fences on British racecourses may be set to change following research led by the University of Exeter into the way that horses perceive colour.
The research, commissioned in 2017 by the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) and Racing Foundation, was undertaken by Dr. Sarah Paul and Professor Martin Stevens of the University of Exeter with the aim of improving obstacle visibility for horses, thus reducing the risk of falls and injuries for horses and jockeys.
Horses can see some colours, but not the same range of colours that humans do.
Humans and other primates have three types of light-responsive cells (cones) in their eyes, giving what is called trichromatic colour vision. Normal human eyes detect four basic colours: red, green, yellow, and blue. They can also differentiate up to 100 subtle variations in hue. Humans with red-green colour vision defects can only see two basic colours - yellow and blue.
The images show what a human sees (left) compared to what a horse sees (right). Research shows that horses see better and may jump differently over white and yellow obstacles compared to the orange currently used on hurdles and fences. Photo: University of Exeter
Horses, in common with other non-primate mammals, have only two types of cone giving dichromatic vision. The colours seen by the horse are likely to be similar to those seen by humans with red-green colour blindness.
Presently, the colour used on hurdle frames, fence take-off boards and guard-rails is orange, based on human vision. However, as horses see colours differently, it is likely that the colour orange does not make the obstacle more visible to the horse.
The research phase of the project included testing the visibility of orange markers and other potential colours at 11 racecourses, and – in collaboration with trainer Richard Phillips – testing the behavioural responses of horses to more prominent colours in a controlled environment.
Orange was confirmed as having decreased visibility and contrast for horses against a range of natural and obstacle backgrounds.
The researchers found that yellow, blue, and white are more conspicuous against fences and their surroundings (foreground/background) than orange, especially yellow fluorescent colours.
The results were consistent under different weather conditions and time of day, except that yellow becomes less visible against the foreground turf under shade, whereas blue, white, and orange are more visible under shade. This effect of shade does not occur for other parts of the fence/hurdle, whereby fluorescent yellow remains most conspicuous.
The jumping responses of horses to fences with orange, yellow, blue, or white take-off boards and guard rails were tested.
The researchers found that the colour of the fences plays a role in both the angle that horses jump a fence and the total distance. Horses adjust their jump angles with colours that are different to orange, and white tends to produce a longer total jump distance.
The optimum colour combination, which is likely to combine the best features of visibility and horse responses under a range of conditions, is to use fluorescent yellow for all hurdles and guard-rails, and fluorescent white for take-off boards. This maximises visibility under all conditions while potentially facilitating better behavioural responses.
As a result, a recommendation has been approved by the sport's Racecourse Committee for a trial using fluorescent yellow for all hurdles and guardrails, and fluorescent white for take-off boards at fences. These colours have been determined to maximise visibility under a wide range of conditions for both humans and horses.
Trials of the proposed new obstacle colours will be conducted at training grounds. Photo: University of Exeter
Retired jockey Ian Popham and conditional jockey Danny Hiskett acted as riders of the horses throughout the trial.
“From riding over the different coloured fences, it was clear to me that over some colours the horses reacted differently and showed the obstacle more respect,” says Ian Popham. “I’m sure other riders will feel the same and this feels like a great idea and opportunity to make the sport safer for both horses and jockeys.”
It has now been agreed that the next phase of the project should see a more extensive trial take place at training grounds to build up a significant dataset before rolling the trial out to a live racing environment.
The results of this research and the ongoing trials will be shared with other racing jurisdictions and equine organisations.
David Sykes, Director of Equine Health and Welfare for the BHA, said: “This fine and important project is an example of how British racing uses advanced scientific and veterinary research to constantly improve racehorse welfare, not only for thoroughbreds in Britain but across other nations and equine disciplines.
“As with the ongoing phased introduction of our padded hurdles – which have proven to reduce faller and injury rates – we will ensure to take our time with this project, make sure there are no unintended consequences and that the evidence of the ongoing trials continue to support the case for change.
“If that proves to be the case then we will look forward to seeing the new designs of hurdles and fences on racecourses, and hopefully further reducing our already declining faller rate.”
British racing has seen a 29 percent reduction in the faller rate since 2004 as a result of ongoing investment in racecourse safety, and enhancements in racehorse care and training standards.
Printed with permission of Mark Andrews, Equine Science Update.
Main article photo: Shutterstock/Gabriel12
This article was originally published in Canada’s Equine Guide 2019, the January/February issue of Canadian Horse Journal.